Bug 2161337
| Summary: | Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Neil Hanlon <neil> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | code, neil, package-review, ppisar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | Trivial | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-02-28 11:26:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1276941 | ||
|
Description
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
2023-01-16 16:22:03 UTC
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96210656 Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5238133 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2161337-python-types-python-dateutil/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05238133-python-types-python-dateutil/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service Is this a runtime dependency or a BuildRequires for testing? If it’s the latter, you might be better patching out the typechecker from the tests (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters). Ah, right. This one is BR for testing datalad locally. I'll take a look at patching it out first. I’m happy to review it if it’s not just for mypy. There are a few Python libraries that use type information at runtime, although I bet this isn’t one of those cases. oops. I apologize, i didn't read the whole discussion before taking. Still happy to take this as my first review if it is necessary. Sorry for the delay folks. This is indeed only a linting dep, so we won't package it. Neil, sorry about that. I have a couple of other reviews pending if you'd like to take them up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173665 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166009 (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #7) > Sorry for the delay folks. This is indeed only a linting dep, so we won't > package it. > > Neil, sorry about that. I have a couple of other reviews pending if you'd > like to take them up: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173665 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166009 Not a problem. I will take a look and see if I might be able to take one of them on with my current workload. Thank you! |