Bug 2170330

Summary:	Caladea no longer metrically equivalent to Cambria (?)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9	Reporter:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component:	ht-caladea-fonts	Assignee:	Parag Nemade <pnemade>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sanket Saikia <ssaikia>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.2	CC:	bbarve, eng-i18n-bugs, extras-qa, pnemade
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	google-crosextra-caladea-fonts-1.002-0.15.20130214.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	2162532	Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-07 08:26:31 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2162532, 2185538
Bug Blocks:

Description Jens Petersen 2023-02-16 07:16:28 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2162532 +++

Description of problem:
ht-caladea-fonts doesn't seem to be metrically equivalent to google-caladea-fonts and so presumably not the same as Cambria?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ht-caladea-fonts-1.001-7.20200428git336a529.fc37

How reproducible:
see screenshot

Steps to Reproduce:
1. fontforge /path/to/the/fonts
2. check their element, font info, os/2, metric

Actual results:
they differ

Expected results:
equivalent values

Additional info:
* https://github.com/huertatipografica/Caladea/issues/4
* seen with a build-time test in LibreOffice that detected the difference from expected values

--- Additional comment from Parag Nemade on 2023-02-01 12:54:25 +08 ---

Is it fine if we revert this font to older tarball from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-20130214.tar.gz ?

--- Additional comment from Caolan McNamara on 2023-02-01 17:01:08 +08 ---

I would think so.

--- Additional comment from Parag Nemade on 2023-02-06 21:24:49 +08 ---

Update:
Re-review + Rename package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166813 has been approved now.
Submitted un-retirement request https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11261

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-07 08:26:31 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (google-crosextra-caladea-fonts bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6366