Bug 2162532 - Caladea no longer metrically equivalent to Cambria (?)
Summary: Caladea no longer metrically equivalent to Cambria (?)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ht-caladea-fonts
Version: 37
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag Nemade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2170330
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-01-19 20:11 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2023-03-20 03:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2170330 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-20 03:42:43 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
side by side of metrics values (298.40 KB, image/png)
2023-01-19 20:11 UTC, Caolan McNamara 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker FC-727 0 None None None 2023-02-01 04:59:34 UTC

Description Caolan McNamara 2023-01-19 20:11:10 UTC 
Created attachment 1939241 [details]
side by side of metrics values

Description of problem:
ht-caladea-fonts doesn't seem to be metrically equivalent to google-caladea-fonts and so presumably not the same as Cambria?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ht-caladea-fonts-1.001-7.20200428git336a529.fc37

How reproducible:
see screenshot

Steps to Reproduce:
1. fontforge /path/to/the/fonts
2. check their element, font info, os/2, metric

Actual results:
they differ

Expected results:
equivalent values

Additional info:
* https://github.com/huertatipografica/Caladea/issues/4
* seen with a build-time test in LibreOffice that detected the difference from expected values
Comment 1 Parag Nemade 2023-02-01 04:54:25 UTC 
Is it fine if we revert this font to older tarball from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-20130214.tar.gz ?
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2023-02-01 09:01:08 UTC 
I would think so.
Comment 3 Parag Nemade 2023-02-06 13:24:49 UTC 
Update:
Re-review + Rename package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166813 has been approved now.
Submitted un-retirement request https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11261
Comment 4 Parag Nemade 2023-03-20 03:42:26 UTC 
ht-caladea-fonts retired today from F38+
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.