RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2162532 +++

Description of problem:
ht-caladea-fonts doesn't seem to be metrically equivalent to google-caladea-fonts and so presumably not the same as Cambria?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ht-caladea-fonts-1.001-7.20200428git336a529.fc37

How reproducible:
see screenshot

Steps to Reproduce:
1. fontforge /path/to/the/fonts
2. check their element, font info, os/2, metric

Actual results:
they differ

Expected results:
equivalent values

Additional info:
* https://github.com/huertatipografica/Caladea/issues/4
* seen with a build-time test in LibreOffice that detected the difference from expected values

--- Additional comment from Parag Nemade on 2023-02-01 12:54:25 +08 ---

Is it fine if we revert this font to older tarball from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-20130214.tar.gz ?

--- Additional comment from Caolan McNamara on 2023-02-01 17:01:08 +08 ---

I would think so.

--- Additional comment from Parag Nemade on 2023-02-06 21:24:49 +08 ---

Update:
Re-review + Rename package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166813 has been approved now.
Submitted un-retirement request https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11261

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (google-crosextra-caladea-fonts bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6366