Bug 217915

Summary: kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:70! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6CC: wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-15 21:09:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Chris Nighswonger 2006-11-30 19:14:26 UTC
Description of problem:

     The problem occurs in exactly the same circumstances on two otherwise very
stable different hardware platforms. When performing multiple mount/umount of
network shares of type 'cifs' the initilization of SELinux causes the kernel to
crash. The problem is reproducable on these two machines with regularity.
However, various amounts of log are available depending on how fast the kernel
killed itself.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

System A: 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6

System B: 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6

How reproducible:

     Consistantly

Steps to Reproduce:

     Repeatedly mount/umount a network share of type 'cifs' using a mount
command similar to this:

mount -t cifs //192.168.x.x/sharename /mnt/sharename -o\
credentials=credentials.txt,dir_mode=0777,file_mode=0777

     ...along with a simple 'umount /mnt/sharename'

  
Actual results:

     Eventual kernel crash.

Expected results:

     Stable system operations.

Additional info:

     Please feel free to contact me for further information. I am willing to
assist with the debug process.

Comment 1 Dan Carpenter 2006-11-30 20:41:41 UTC
This is the same as bug 214622.

A couple other people have reported this bug too...

People were also getting bug 216001 which has a similar trace.  One of those
reporters was using cifs, but i'm not sure about the other.

Comment 2 Adam Jackson 2006-12-15 21:09:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217914 ***