Bug 217915 - kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:70! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Summary: kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:70! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 217914
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 6
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-30 19:14 UTC by Chris Nighswonger
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-15 21:09:18 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Nighswonger 2006-11-30 19:14:26 UTC
Description of problem:

     The problem occurs in exactly the same circumstances on two otherwise very
stable different hardware platforms. When performing multiple mount/umount of
network shares of type 'cifs' the initilization of SELinux causes the kernel to
crash. The problem is reproducable on these two machines with regularity.
However, various amounts of log are available depending on how fast the kernel
killed itself.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

System A: 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6

System B: 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6

How reproducible:

     Consistantly

Steps to Reproduce:

     Repeatedly mount/umount a network share of type 'cifs' using a mount
command similar to this:

mount -t cifs //192.168.x.x/sharename /mnt/sharename -o\
credentials=credentials.txt,dir_mode=0777,file_mode=0777

     ...along with a simple 'umount /mnt/sharename'

  
Actual results:

     Eventual kernel crash.

Expected results:

     Stable system operations.

Additional info:

     Please feel free to contact me for further information. I am willing to
assist with the debug process.

Comment 1 Dan Carpenter 2006-11-30 20:41:41 UTC
This is the same as bug 214622.

A couple other people have reported this bug too...

People were also getting bug 216001 which has a similar trace.  One of those
reporters was using cifs, but i'm not sure about the other.

Comment 2 Adam Jackson 2006-12-15 21:09:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217914 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.