Bug 225731
| Summary: | Merge Review: epic | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Component: | epic | Assignee: | Jiri Popelka <jpopelka> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 23 | CC: | dan.mashal, mattdm, pvrabec, vcrhonek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-12-20 11:56:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 18:33:24 UTC
formal review of epic-2.10-6.fc12 is here, see the notes below: YES source files match upstream: 865424a56eaaf674847d0e48bcdbc2c5 sf-1.35.irc.gz 8ed73a76ac758f581d764dc60b708e86 sf-bitchx-scheme.irc.gz dd75ad70b46b331b008d976880899233 sf-eggsandham-scheme.irc.gz 3a7151f0b2913964eb5e38b6c1a2697d sf-light-scheme.irc.gz 90c9dc5fc9f372843f8a0732fba61eb1 sf-perry-scheme.irc.gz 92789d75f12882696817865ea072e44a epic4-2.10.tar.bz2 b28872ca9234650eda6842ffc3425849 epic4-help-current.tar.bz2 YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. YES license field matches the actual license. YES license is open source-compatible. YES License text included in package. NO latest version is being packaged. epic4-2.10.1.tar.bz2 was released 09/05/2009 YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. >rpmlint epic-2.10-6.fc12.src.rpm epic-2.10-6.fc12.x86_64.rpm epic.x86_64: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/nopaste ... epic.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/epic/help/8_Scripts/mkpdir epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg-aa 0644 /bin/bash epic.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/epic/script/epic-crypt-gpg 0644 /bin/bash epic.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/epic-2.10/COPYRIGHT epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/help/5_Programming/fec epic.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers epic.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/epic/ircII.servers 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 87 errors, 1 warnings. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. ?? file permissions are appropriate. See some rpmlint errors. YES scriptlets are sane. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES no headers. YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. Please look at the rpmlint errors and either fix them or confirm they are false positives. Mass reassigning all merge reviews to their component. For more details, see this FESCO ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1269 If you don't know what merge reviews are about, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Merge_Reviews How to handle this bug is left to the discretion of the package maintainer. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23 This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |