Bug 226027

Summary: Merge Review: libICE
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ajax, redhat-bugzilla, sandmann
Target Milestone: ---Flags: tibbs: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-22 21:29:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:25:04 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: libICE

Initial Owner: sandmann@redhat.com

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2009-01-13 21:52:15 UTC
libICE.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libICE-1.0.4/README
libICE.src:68: E: files-attr-not-set
libICE.src:69: E: files-attr-not-set
libICE.src:70: E: files-attr-not-set
libICE.src:72: E: files-attr-not-set
libICE.src:74: E: files-attr-not-set
libICE.src:75: E: files-attr-not-set

-> Add %defattr(-,root,root,-) to %files devel and kill the empty file or
solve it somehow.

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2009-01-13 21:52:58 UTC
Adam, are you now the maintainer of the package?

Comment 3 Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 20:11:23 UTC
Fixed in 1.0.4-5.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-22 21:29:28 UTC
So rpmlint is just:

libICE.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libICE.so.6.3.0 
libICE-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

Neither of those is really a problem, although there's probably a bug in the first one.

I made some tweaks in CVS:
- Minor changes to 
- Don't own /usr/include/X11
- No need for a versioned dependency on xorg-x11-filesystem.
- Change xorg-x11-filesystem to a regular dependency.

Honestly I'm not sure why the -devel package had
  Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem
since it has no scriptlets.  I hope I'm not missing something.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
 summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11

   pkgconfig(ice) = 1.0.4
   libICE-devel = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE-devel(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11

* a shared library is present:
  ldconfig is called properly
  unversioned .so link is in the -devel package.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* pkgconfig file is in the -devel package.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED, and closed.