Bug 227073

Summary:	Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Rafael H. Schloming <rafaels>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	adel.gadllah, cse.cem+redhatbugz, tross, viveklak
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-03-06 02:04:02 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rafael H. Schloming 2007-02-02 17:41:27 UTC

Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/specs/joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://jpackage.hmdc.harvard.edu/JPackage/1.7/generic/SRPMS.free/joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp.src.rpm
Description: Joda-Time provides a quality replacement for the Java date
and time classes. The design allows for multiple calendar
systems, while still providing a simple API. The 'default'
calendar is the ISO8601 standard which is used by XML. The
Gregorian, Julian, Buddhist, Coptic and Ethiopic systems
are also included, and we welcome further additions.
Supporting classes include time zone, duration, format
and parsing.

Javadoc for joda-time.

Docs for joda-time.

Comment 1 Adel Gadllah 2007-07-20 07:16:05 UTC

Some comments to the spec file:
1) why are you using an epoch?
2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor"
3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section   free" ?
4) use %doc instead of 
"%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt"
5)

Comment 2 Adel Gadllah 2007-07-20 07:16:40 UTC

Some comments to the spec file:
1) why are you using an epoch?
2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor"
3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section   free" ?
4) use %doc instead of 
"%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt"

Comment 3 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-14 00:02:26 UTC

*** Bug 252087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-19 12:09:52 UTC

ping?

Comment 5 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-03 15:49:19 UTC

This request is over a year old; is there any chance I could take over and fix
the problems that exist with it? (I have a package that depends on this.)

Comment 6 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-05 21:02:18 UTC

Seeing as how this review is stalled, and in accordance with
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews), I will
close this bug in a week unless the submitter responds.

Comment 7 Rafael H. Schloming 2008-03-06 01:48:00 UTC

Please feel free to take over or close the bug as you wish.

Comment 8 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-06 02:04:02 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436239 ***