Bug 227073 - Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API
Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 436239
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
: 252087 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-02 12:41 EST by Rafael H. Schloming
Modified: 2014-12-01 18:13 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-05 21:04:02 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Rafael H. Schloming 2007-02-02 12:41:27 EST
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rafaels/specs/joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://jpackage.hmdc.harvard.edu/JPackage/1.7/generic/SRPMS.free/joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp.src.rpm
Description: Joda-Time provides a quality replacement for the Java date
and time classes. The design allows for multiple calendar
systems, while still providing a simple API. The 'default'
calendar is the ISO8601 standard which is used by XML. The
Gregorian, Julian, Buddhist, Coptic and Ethiopic systems
are also included, and we welcome further additions.
Supporting classes include time zone, duration, format
and parsing.

Javadoc for joda-time.

Docs for joda-time.
Comment 1 Adel Gadllah 2007-07-20 03:16:05 EDT
Some comments to the spec file:
1) why are you using an epoch?
2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor"
3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section   free" ?
4) use %doc instead of 
"%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt"
5)
Comment 2 Adel Gadllah 2007-07-20 03:16:40 EDT
Some comments to the spec file:
1) why are you using an epoch?
2) Remove "Distrubution" and "Vendor"
3) Whats the purpose of this "%define section   free" ?
4) use %doc instead of 
"%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt"
Comment 3 Vivek Lakshmanan 2007-08-13 20:02:26 EDT
*** Bug 252087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-19 07:09:52 EST
ping?
Comment 5 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-03 10:49:19 EST
This request is over a year old; is there any chance I could take over and fix
the problems that exist with it? (I have a package that depends on this.)
Comment 6 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-05 16:02:18 EST
Seeing as how this review is stalled, and in accordance with
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews), I will
close this bug in a week unless the submitter responds.
Comment 7 Rafael H. Schloming 2008-03-05 20:48:00 EST
Please feel free to take over or close the bug as you wish.
Comment 8 Conrad Meyer 2008-03-05 21:04:02 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436239 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.