Bug 2280349

Summary: Improve the "Using a Red Hat Image Builder image for provisioning" chapter of provisioning guide
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Sayan Das <saydas>
Component: ProvisioningAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED QA Contact: Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.14.4CC: sshtein, zuansorg
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Documentation, MigratedToJIRA, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-06-06 17:39:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sayan Das 2024-05-14 13:55:23 UTC
Document URL: 

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.14/html-single/provisioning_hosts/index#Using_an_Image_Builder_Image_for_Provisioning_provisioning


Section Number and Name: 

Chapter 8. Using a Red Hat Image Builder Image for Provisioning


Describe the issue: 

As it was being discussed in BZ# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269386#c13 [ internal comments 13 and 14 ] , 


We do mention that 
~~~
On Satellite, create a custom product, add a custom file repository to this product, and upload the image to the repository. For more information, see Importing Individual ISO Images and Files in Managing Content.
~~~

but then if i scroll up a bit, Just under the Chapter name we say:
~~
Using RHEL web console, you can access Red Hat Image Builder and build images that you can then upload to an HTTP server and use this image to provision hosts. 
~~

So both statements contradict each other. 



Suggestions for improvement: 

If The image needs to be part of a custom repo and that repo needs to be part of the same CV+LCE that is selected while creating the host profile, we need to make it abundantly clear in the doc section. 

If this method of deployment can be done in both ways i.e. The image can be either in an HTTP exposed location or else within a custom repo+product, Then both the processes should be tested and properly documented.


Additional information: 

NOTE: If the HTTP(s) way works i.e. we can keep the image on a separate server and access it over HTTP(s) while deployment happens, then most end-users would prefer doing so.

Comment 1 Eric Helms 2024-06-06 17:39:03 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "SAT-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-10-05 04:27:52 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days