This bug has been migrated to another issue tracking site. It has been closed here and may no longer be being monitored.

If you would like to get updates for this issue, or to participate in it, you may do so at Red Hat Issue Tracker .
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2280349 - Improve the "Using a Red Hat Image Builder image for provisioning" chapter of provisioning guide
Summary: Improve the "Using a Red Hat Image Builder image for provisioning" chapter of...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Provisioning
Version: 6.14.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Satellite QE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-05-14 13:55 UTC by Sayan Das
Modified: 2024-10-05 04:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-06-06 17:39:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker   SAT-25131 0 None Migrated None 2024-06-06 17:39:02 UTC

Description Sayan Das 2024-05-14 13:55:23 UTC
Document URL: 

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.14/html-single/provisioning_hosts/index#Using_an_Image_Builder_Image_for_Provisioning_provisioning


Section Number and Name: 

Chapter 8. Using a Red Hat Image Builder Image for Provisioning


Describe the issue: 

As it was being discussed in BZ# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269386#c13 [ internal comments 13 and 14 ] , 


We do mention that 
~~~
On Satellite, create a custom product, add a custom file repository to this product, and upload the image to the repository. For more information, see Importing Individual ISO Images and Files in Managing Content.
~~~

but then if i scroll up a bit, Just under the Chapter name we say:
~~
Using RHEL web console, you can access Red Hat Image Builder and build images that you can then upload to an HTTP server and use this image to provision hosts. 
~~

So both statements contradict each other. 



Suggestions for improvement: 

If The image needs to be part of a custom repo and that repo needs to be part of the same CV+LCE that is selected while creating the host profile, we need to make it abundantly clear in the doc section. 

If this method of deployment can be done in both ways i.e. The image can be either in an HTTP exposed location or else within a custom repo+product, Then both the processes should be tested and properly documented.


Additional information: 

NOTE: If the HTTP(s) way works i.e. we can keep the image on a separate server and access it over HTTP(s) while deployment happens, then most end-users would prefer doing so.

Comment 1 Eric Helms 2024-06-06 17:39:03 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "SAT-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-10-05 04:27:52 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.