Bug 2292733
| Summary: | please move openjpeg2 to openjpeg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sergio Basto <sergio> |
| Component: | openjpeg | Assignee: | Stewart Smith <trawets> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | hobbes1069, manisandro, rdieter, trawets, yselkowi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-07-25 21:53:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sergio Basto
2024-06-17 18:33:05 UTC
Would you be available for taking the rename review? yes , let me know Review request posted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294380 Reassigning to openjpeg, please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294380#c4 Ping @rdieter, @trawets? Do you have any objections if I proceed with moving openjpeg2 into openjpeg? I'm also happy to take over the openjpeg repo if desired. @rdieter and @trawets , me and Sandro would like take over openjpeg , we want rename openjpeg2 to openjpeg because openjpeg isn't used for any package and in the future will simplify the packaging of dependent packages please add us as co-mantainers fas: smani and sergiomb Thank you I have no problem with openjpeg2 moving to openjpeg. I’ll try and get back to consolidating the CVE fixes for OpenPOWER between Fedora and others (including Amazon Linux 2, as there’s a handful more there) at some point soon. ok you got here the pull requeste to Renamed openjpeg2 -> openjpeg https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openjpeg/pull-request/1 or and please add us as co-mantainers, fas: smani and sergiomb Merged and added. Hopefully there's no openjpeg 1 users left, and we can all be happy. yes :D , thank you ! openjpeg2 still needs to be retired. since we obsoletes and provides openjpeg2 [1], it is safe retired openjpeg2
[1]
Obsoletes: openjpeg2-devel < 2.5.2-2
Provides: openjpeg2-devel = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: openjpeg2 < 2.5.2-2
Provides: openjpeg2 = %{version}-%{release}
Hi, I never mention but this a rename process (rename openjpeg2 to openjpeg) and we followed [1], now we are in last step which is retirement on openjeg2 [2] . I think we just need to check if package is marked as blocked in koji and it is ! [3] [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ [3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#_koji koji list-pkgs --show-blocked --tag f41 --package openjpeg2 Package Tag Extra Arches Owner ----------------------- ----------------------- ---------------- --------------- openjpeg2 f41 smani [BLOCKED] |