Bug 2305164

Summary:	Please branch and build python-pytest-xdist in epel10
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Nils Philippsen <nphilipp>
Component:	python-pytest-xdist	Assignee:	Scott Talbert <swt>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	carl, code, davide, kkeithle, mhroncok, nphilipp, swt
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-pytest-xdist-3.6.1-4.el10_0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-10-10 21:41:19 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2303885, 2304139, 2307139, 2307140
Bug Blocks:	2303880, 1914423, 2305083, 2311639

Description Nils Philippsen 2024-08-15 14:22:02 UTC

Please branch and build python-pytest-xdist in epel10.  I'd like to
add python-rpmautospec/-core in bug 2305083 into EPEL10 but python3-pytest-xdist
is a prerequisite.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2024-08-20 09:52:51 UTC

python-pytest-xdist has quite a large dep tree to unfold. Consider not using it just yet, as its usage in python-rpmautospec/-core should be optional.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2024-08-20 09:54:47 UTC

FWIW pytest-xdist requires execnet which needs at least the optional_test_deps bcond disabled to build in EPEL 10, unless we want to include eventlet which is obsleted upstream.

Comment 3 Carl George 🎩 2024-08-22 05:15:09 UTC

With the merge of https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpmautospec/pull-request/7, the python-pytest-xdist buildrequirement no longer applies for EPEL 10.  I imagine this package will still be generally useful in EPEL 10 for other packages, but the pressure is off to get it in for python-rpmautospec.

Comment 4 Scott Talbert 2024-09-11 14:45:23 UTC

*** Bug 2311647 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Scott Talbert 2024-10-10 21:36:19 UTC

Miro, does that mean this package has been added to RHEL proper?

Comment 6 Ben Beasley 2024-10-10 21:53:59 UTC

(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #5)
> Miro, does that mean this package has been added to RHEL proper?

The package was built for EPEL10 in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-5fe63b558c.

Comment 7 Miro Hrončok 2024-10-10 23:16:09 UTC

When I built python-execnet I went ahead and built this one, as it was finally unblocked. Since the branch was already there and there were no changes needed, I assumed it's OK.

Comment 8 Scott Talbert 2024-10-11 00:02:37 UTC

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> When I built python-execnet I went ahead and built this one, as it was
> finally unblocked. Since the branch was already there and there were no
> changes needed, I assumed it's OK.

Yep totally makes sense.  I was more surprised when I didn't see a build on the homepage of src.fp.o, but there must just be some lag there.