Bug 253378

Summary: fc6 kernel 2.6.22 breaks bcm4401 network driver
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David Kahn <dmkahn>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-08-20 19:12:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Kahn 2007-08-18 15:15:06 UTC
Description of problem:

Network doesn't work when upgraded to 2.6.22.1-32 kernel with Broadcom bcm4401
motherboard network device on Abit IS-10 and Dell Dimension 2400

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum update
2. reboot
3.
  
Actual results:

onboard bmc4401 doesn't work (network is physically
connected to the switch, but unable to ping in
or out with kernel 2.6.22.1 Works fine with 2.6.20

Expected results:

The network should work :)

Additional info:

There's a huge thread about config option changes for onboard vs card-based
bcm44xx (b44.c) during 2.6.22-rc2 development. Not sure what (if any) the
outcome was, but for me, my bmc4401 based machines all broke when I upgraded to
fc6 kernel 2.6.22.1. There's a 2.6.22.2 out, and it downloaded, but the release
notes for 2.6.22.2 don't say anything about fixes for bcm440x

Comment 1 David Kahn 2007-08-18 15:17:10 UTC
Sorry, anywhere I typed bmc4401, I meant Broadcom BCM4401

-David


Comment 2 David Kahn 2007-08-18 15:21:30 UTC
This is the thread I referred to:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0705.3/0304.html



Comment 3 Chuck Ebbert 2007-08-20 19:12:49 UTC
Fixed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 251754 ***