Bug 298071

Summary:	Segmentation fault running eclipse -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Marcano <robert>
Component:	eclipse	Assignee:	Andrew Overholt <overholt>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	aph, oliver, overholt
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ppc64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-10-25 11:00:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Marcano 2007-09-20 13:09:05 UTC

Description of problem:
When building eclipse-subclipse

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Rawhide

How reproducible:
always happens building eclipse-subclipse Fedora package

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Checkout eclipse-subclipse from CVS
2. run make srpm on devel branch
3. rebuild the RPM
  
Actual results:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.48384: line 57:   654 Segmentation fault      eclipse
-application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -Duser.home=$homedir -Dtype=feature
-Did=org.tigris.subversion.subclipse -DsourceDirectory=$(pwd)
-DbaseLocation=$SDK
-Dbuilder=/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build
-f /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml

Expected results:
Build the RPM without problems like on F-7 and FC-6

Additional info:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=167365&name=build.log

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2007-09-20 14:25:09 UTC

I don't have a ppc64 box on which to test this :(.

Comment 2 Robert Marcano 2007-10-19 13:24:56 UTC

I disabled ppc64 build, but still the upgrade path will be broken for previous
fedora users on ppc64, just requested help on the devel list looking for someone
with a ppc64

Comment 3 Andrew Overholt 2007-10-22 19:06:22 UTC

So this is really a gcj on ppc64 but, right?  Should we ask Andrew Haley to take
a look at it?

Comment 4 Andrew Haley 2007-10-23 09:27:29 UTC

This is probably the kernel bug here

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-10/msg00197.html

Waiting a kernel update.

Comment 5 Andrew Haley 2007-10-25 11:00:36 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 350291 ***