Bug 298071 - Segmentation fault running eclipse -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner
Summary: Segmentation fault running eclipse -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 350291
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse
Version: rawhide
Hardware: ppc64
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Overholt
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-09-20 13:09 UTC by Robert Marcano
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-25 11:00:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Marcano 2007-09-20 13:09:05 UTC
Description of problem:
When building eclipse-subclipse

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Rawhide

How reproducible:
always happens building eclipse-subclipse Fedora package

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Checkout eclipse-subclipse from CVS
2. run make srpm on devel branch
3. rebuild the RPM
  
Actual results:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.48384: line 57:   654 Segmentation fault      eclipse
-application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner -Duser.home=$homedir -Dtype=feature
-Did=org.tigris.subversion.subclipse -DsourceDirectory=$(pwd)
-DbaseLocation=$SDK
-Dbuilder=/usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build
-f /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml

Expected results:
Build the RPM without problems like on F-7 and FC-6

Additional info:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=167365&name=build.log

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt 2007-09-20 14:25:09 UTC
I don't have a ppc64 box on which to test this :(.

Comment 2 Robert Marcano 2007-10-19 13:24:56 UTC
I disabled ppc64 build, but still the upgrade path will be broken for previous
fedora users on ppc64, just requested help on the devel list looking for someone
with a ppc64

Comment 3 Andrew Overholt 2007-10-22 19:06:22 UTC
So this is really a gcj on ppc64 but, right?  Should we ask Andrew Haley to take
a look at it?

Comment 4 Andrew Haley 2007-10-23 09:27:29 UTC
This is probably the kernel bug here

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-10/msg00197.html

Waiting a kernel update.

Comment 5 Andrew Haley 2007-10-25 11:00:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 350291 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.