|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Component:||gnome-netstatus||Assignee:||Vivek Shah <boni.vivek>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||11||CC:||jfrieben, kas111, mark, rvokal, tomg68|
|Fixed In Version:||2.26.0-1.fc10||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-03 19:47:06 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Bill Nottingham 2007-10-04 15:02:05 UTC
Description of problem: The device list it shows consists of: - lo - a blank - an unprintable character This is on a box that has a fairly standard lo/eth0/eth1 setup. Why is this in the default install, any way? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-netstatus-2.12.1-1.fc7
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2007-10-05 03:06:59 UTC
It seems to work ok here, I see tun0, wlan0 and lo in the combobox. But I agree that it doesn't need to be in the default install anymore. NMs connection information dialog shows almost the same information, except for the amount of transmitted/received data.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-05 18:22:06 UTC
Made optional in comps.
Comment 3 Joachim Frieben 2007-10-30 23:01:25 UTC
Still not functional as of today's 'rawhide'. Symptoms identical to the initial report. Btw, still a very useful tool, when the network is controlled in the oldfashioned way [without NM].
Comment 4 Joachim Frieben 2007-12-08 16:59:03 UTC
As of day, I still have this combination of lo, a blank, and an unprintable character. However, all network interfaces [lo, eth0, eth1, ath0] work as expected. For users who need to rely on static network connections [in my case, LaserJet printer w/JetDirect interface] NM is not usable at the moment, and it's for exactly this reason that NM is disabled by default. Thus, the connection information provided by NM is no argument for not supporting the netstatus applet anymore. Btw, I'm on an x86_64 system here, and I was wondering if the apparently contradictory observations in the original report and in comment #1 might be related to the platform.
Comment 5 petrosyan 2008-02-17 03:26:29 UTC
*** Bug 161216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 petrosyan 2008-02-17 03:34:29 UTC
this bug has been fixed in Ubuntu https://launchpad.net/gnome-netstatus/+bug/21234
Comment 7 petrosyan 2008-02-17 04:28:53 UTC
Bill, even though you made gnome-netstatus optional in comps.xml it still gets installed by default, because gnome-applets requires it. $ rpm -e gnome-netstatus error: Failed dependencies: gnome-netstatus >= 2.8.0-2 is needed by (installed) gnome-applets-2.21.91-1.fc9.i386
Comment 8 Joachim Frieben 2008-02-17 07:27:53 UTC
Created attachment 295091 [details] Upstream patch from GNOME bug 453070 Too funny that we looked at this simultaneously. Yesterday, I rebuilt the gnome-netstatus RPM with the modifications implemented by the patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453070#c3 as of 2007-07-16 and it works perfectly on my x86_64 box.
Comment 9 Joachim Frieben 2008-02-17 07:35:02 UTC
Note: comment #6 and references therein refer to a different upstream bug.
Comment 10 Joachim Frieben 2008-02-17 09:10:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #7) > Bill, even though you made gnome-netstatus optional in comps.xml it still > gets installed by default, because gnome-applets requires it. Right, and there are good reasons to leave things as they are: NM is currently disabled by default in the install spin because is immature and breaks connectivity even for simple setups. This means that in general there is no network applet other than netstatus for the GNOME desktop. Now that it's working again it's a must for the default GNOME setup. Btw, shouldn't "Hardware" be set to x86_64 or has this issue also been observed on other platforms such as x86?
Comment 11 Joachim Frieben 2008-02-18 13:27:18 UTC
Fixed in gnome-netstatus-2.12.1-4.fc9.
Comment 12 petrosyan 2008-02-20 04:55:20 UTC
I still see a list of: - lo - a blank - an unprintable character with the latest gnome-netstatus-2.12.1-4.fc9
Comment 13 Joachim Frieben 2008-02-20 06:33:54 UTC
Argh! gnome-netstatus-2.12.1-4.fc9 retained the WLAN setting from my self-built RPM which is the reason why it worked for me. Once changed to a different device, "ath0" disappears, and things look exactly like before. I have just unpacked the SRPM and it's the unpatched version .. %@&#§!
Comment 14 Mark McClelland 2008-04-25 23:30:15 UTC
This is still broken in F8 on x86_64. The patch fixes it for me.
Comment 15 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 03:19:30 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 16 Joachim Frieben 2008-08-27 09:10:29 UTC
There has been a new patch added upstream to fix this issue. Can this at least be included as a temporary workaround? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=115547&action=view This bug is approaching its first anniversary!
Comment 17 Joachim Frieben 2008-11-27 10:12:25 UTC
Issue still present as of gnome-netstatus-2.12.2-2.fc10.x86_64. It has slightly evolved however, namely on my system where currently only ifcfg-lo and ifcfg-wlan0 do exist, only devices -blank- and -lo- are displayed, the unprintable character is gone. Wireless traffic still is not monitored though.
Comment 18 Joachim Frieben 2008-11-27 10:37:12 UTC
Created attachment 324857 [details] Fedoraized version of patch from GNOME bug 453070 comment #13 The gnome-netstatus package builds and works properly after adding the attached patch "iface.patch" and updating gnome-netstatus.spec: Patch1: iface.patch .. %patch1 -p1 -b .iface
Comment 19 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-02-09 18:38:24 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 20 Joachim Frieben 2009-02-09 19:07:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #19) Excellent, I had attached a "ready-to-use" patch to comment #18 which does not need anything but to dump it into the SRPM and the tiny addition to the spec file along the direction of comment #18. Thanks!
Comment 21 Joachim Frieben 2009-05-20 07:44:01 UTC
Thus bug is still not resolved as of gnome-netstatus-2.12.2-3.fc11.x86_64.
Comment 22 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:54:51 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 23 Joachim Frieben 2009-06-10 08:57:15 UTC
'gnome-netstatus' still doesn't work on x86_64 systems as of F11 final w/updates. That's a pity given that functional patches have been available upstream for a long time.
Comment 24 Joachim Frieben 2009-06-12 05:15:58 UTC
Upstream version 2.26.0 still hasn't fixed this issue. However, the patch from comment #18 applies to both version 2.12.2 and 2.26.0 and resolves this bug. Please consider including it into the SRPM. Thanks!
Comment 25 Vivek Shah 2009-06-20 18:13:13 UTC
Sorry for the long negligence on my part for so long. I have prepared the SRPM please find it here. I have an old broken Fedora 9 system so I could not test the RPMs. Can someone please check it before I move it in ? I have also updated gnome-netstatus to 2.26.0. Thanks. Please find the SRPM here: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
Comment 26 Vivek Shah 2009-06-21 07:27:32 UTC
*** Bug 481596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Vivek Shah 2009-06-24 10:42:35 UTC
Can someone please test this SRPM. Thanks.
Comment 28 Joachim Frieben 2009-06-24 20:46:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #27) Yes, it works. Pushing to updates and closing this bug then, I suppose.
Comment 29 Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 18:15:35 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc10
Comment 30 Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 18:17:05 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc11
Comment 31 Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 21:27:31 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-netstatus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7090
Comment 32 Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 21:30:37 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-netstatus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7115
Comment 33 Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 19:46:54 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 34 Fedora Update System 2009-07-03 19:51:37 UTC
gnome-netstatus-2.26.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.