Bug 336731
| Summary: | fontconfig-devel.i386 conflicts with fontconfig-devel.x86_64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Benjamin Smedberg <benjamin> |
| Component: | yum | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 7 | CC: | behdad, nicolas.mailhot |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-10-26 01:10:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Benjamin Smedberg
2007-10-17 21:13:22 UTC
looks like more a tools problem than a package one well... yum is doing the correct thing I think; the arch-specific packages shouldn't have arch-indepent files in them What's happening basically is that if two arch packages want to install the same file, the files should be identical. That works fine for doc files, except that if they are generated as part of the build and have a timestamp or something you are doomed... Fixed this in rhel4 and rhel5. The fix is to not rebuild docs... |