Bug 33916

Summary:	rpmfind broken after upgrade to rpm 4.0.2
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	David E. Young <de.young>
Component:	rpmfind	Assignee:	Jeff Johnson <jbj>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2	CC:	bscott, janc
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-06-30 16:37:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David E. Young 2001-03-29 19:39:31 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586)


After upgrading to rpm 4.0.2, rpmfind fails with the following:

  rpmfind: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0:
undefined symbol: ufdio


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. upgrade to rpm 4.0.2
2. run 'rpmfind'
3.
	

Actual Results:  rpmfind: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined symbol: ufdio


Expected Results:  Actually, this error causes the Ximian Gnome update
agent to fail.

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2001-04-03 14:08:13 UTC

*** Bug 10756 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jan Carlson 2001-04-03 15:18:13 UTC

rpm-4.0.2 not only breaks rpmfind, it also breaks
rebuilding of the rpmfind rpm!

I need a workaround, please!  My boss wants rpmfind
to work again, and I can't reinstall his machine just
to get rid of rpm-4.0.2. 

Help me fix rpmfind so my boss will stop saying that
Red Hat updates are evil!

Comment 3 Daniel Veillard 2001-05-14 15:17:22 UTC

This is an rpmfind FAQ:
http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/faq.html

Possible solution: grab the source RPM and rebuild it locally as explained
in entry #4

Daniel

Comment 4 Jeff Johnson 2001-06-30 16:37:37 UTC

This problem appears resolved, reopen if not.

Comment 5 Daniel Veillard 2001-07-17 23:19:51 UTC

Okay seems fixed, then let's close this bug,

Daniel