Bug 439432
Summary: | Updating unread messages in messge window loses the message you are reading | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Saltzman <mjs> |
Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | mcrha |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-31 13:12:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthew Saltzman
2008-03-28 17:46:53 UTC
Is there any difference between pressing F5 and timed update? I mean, there is almost none for the code, but for the user it can be. One can expect the F5 will not take care of actually selected (or rather focused) message. Am I right? F5 does not remove any messages marked read from the window. Mark some messages unread. Select "show unread messages". Mark all messaged read. Press F5. No change in display. Same behavior if you click send/receive. Now the case I saw occurred when I was reading a folder and filters caused an arriving message to be moved to that folder. What I don't know (I can't think of a good way to simulate it, don't have the patience to wait around) is whether old messages are cleared in the case where pressing F5 causes new messages to appear. If you have an easy way to simulate that, I'd be glad to try. In any case, that might be the interesting execution path to track. |