Bug 440037

Summary: Resolution fixed at 320x200
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Lennart Poettering <lpoetter>
Component: xorg-x11-drv-atiAssignee: X/OpenGL Maintenance List <xgl-maint>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: mcepl
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-11 09:12:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Xorg.log
none
xorg.conf none

Description Lennart Poettering 2008-04-01 14:35:17 UTC 
Upgraded to rawhide yesterday (xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.8.0-8.fc9.x86_64)

Since then my dual-head setup on RV630 doesn't work anymore. Although xrandr
claims it found both screens and configured them to the native resolution only
the left one (DVI-0) actually is enabled and to a resolution of 320x200 (or
something similarly small). The virtual screen seems to be set up correctly
however, I can only see the upper leftmost part of the virtual screen.

Playing around with xrandr and switching resolutions doesn't have any effect.
xrandr will always claim that it executed what i asked it for, however, only the
left screen stays enabled always on physical 320x200.
Comment 1 Lennart Poettering 2008-04-01 14:50:57 UTC 
Created attachment 299907 [details]
Xorg.log
Comment 2 Lennart Poettering 2008-04-01 14:51:16 UTC 
Created attachment 299908 [details]
xorg.conf
Comment 3 Lennart Poettering 2008-04-01 18:27:53 UTC 
BTW, downgrading to -6 solved the problem. -7 was broken in the same way.
Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2008-04-01 22:04:51 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 429183 ***
Comment 5 Dave Airlie 2008-04-02 00:43:05 UTC 
hmm wierd can you try -9 when it lands or from koji and let me know.

quite a bit changed between -6 and -7 and maybe something else broke..
Comment 6 Lennart Poettering 2008-04-03 19:06:26 UTC 
I tried -9 now. Nothing changed. Same issue.

BTW. I reopened this issue, because I believe  that 429183 is a different issue.
My issues on ATI, the other bug is on intel.

(Oh, to get X after the upgrade running I had to move the glx module out of the
way, otherwise X would segfault when initializing it. But that's a different issue)
Comment 7 Dave Airlie 2008-04-09 04:18:48 UTC 
can you try -10?

I think upstream fixed this.
Comment 8 Lennart Poettering 2008-04-10 22:22:27 UTC 
-10 seems to work fine. The screens where initialized in a crazy way at first
after login (might be due to some old config settings?), but xrandr fixed it.

Thanks.