Bug 443597

Summary: Fontset isn't applied to the face
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Component: emacsAssignee: Chip Coldwell <coldwell>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-22 17:12:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Akira TAGOH 2008-04-22 13:49:41 UTC 
Description of problem:
creating a fontset by create-fontset-from-fontset-spec and do set-face-font with
it worked fine on 22.x but it doesn't on 23.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
emacs-23.0.60-2.fc9

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.evaluate the following elisp
(create-fontset-from-fontset-spec
  "-default-foobarbaz-medium-r-*--14-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-14,
   ascii:-*-liberation mono-medium-r-*--14-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1,
   japanese-jisx0208:-*-vl gothic-medium-r-*--14-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208.1990-*")
2.see the fontset with describe-fontset if the fontset was created properly
3.evaluate (set-face-font 'default
"-default-foobarbaz-medium-r-*--14-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-14")
  
Actual results:
which font is set to the face really depends on your locale. Family in the
result of (describe-face 'default) should be something what you can see with
fc-match.

Expected results:
-default-foobarbaz-medium-r-*--14-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-14 should be applied to the
face.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2008-04-22 13:54:14 UTC 
BTW --disable-font-backend doesn't help. that makes another error, "Invalid font
or fontset name". again, this worked fine on emacs 22.x.
Comment 2 Chip Coldwell 2008-04-22 17:12:32 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 443639 ***