|Summary:||link from netcdf-3 breaks upgrades|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Patrice Dumas <pertusus>|
|Component:||netcdf||Assignee:||Ed Hill <ed>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||florian.laroche, jspaleta, orion, pertusus|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-09-03 21:00:00 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Patrice Dumas 2008-05-18 11:24:08 UTC
Description of problem: As described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433096 Or what I just filled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447156 Although I think that this should be fixed in rpm, I think that this directory could be completely dropped, there is time until F-10 and to fix the netcdf packages. But it is up to you. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Comment 1 Ed Hill 2008-05-18 12:37:30 UTC
Hi Patrice, thank you for pointing this out. I had no idea that this RPM problem existed. I was just trying to make life easier for people used to having the "/usr/include/netcdf-3" directory. How annoying! OK, so I agree that the best fix is to delete /usr/include/netcdf-3 and make all the necessary ("-I/usr/include/netcdf") changes to the dependent RPMs. Does anyone have any objections to that?
Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2008-05-19 15:39:01 UTC
No objections here.
Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2008-09-03 20:18:08 UTC
*** Bug 448265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2008-09-03 21:00:00 UTC
Removed in rawhide - version 4.0.0-1.