Bug 452392
| Summary: | File conflicts with libkdcraw/libkipi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bill Crawford <billcrawford1970> |
| Component: | kdegraphics | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, than |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-07-21 17:39:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 446427 | ||
|
Description
Bill Crawford
2008-06-21 22:58:39 UTC
I'll take care of this. stage 1: fix runtime conflicts, -devel conflicts remain (%_libdir symlinks, pkgconfig). Re-opening, pending -devel fixes. -devel symlinks are fixable (using similar hacks such as in kdegames), but I'm stumped what to do with the pkgconfig files. Ideas? Suggestions? We could require setting a nonstandard PKG_CONFIG_PATH. But I wonder if it is really worth it in this case. Evil idea, since nothing that I know-of even uses the kde4-versions of these libraries, we could (temporarily?) omit their conflicting -devel parts. But the KDE 4 Digikam will surely use them? (But will we still need the KDE 3 versions when we'll have KDE 4 Digikam?) Otherwise, only Gwenview (which is in kdegraphics itself, so it doesn't need a kdegraphics-devel), I don't think anything can use them yet. Uh, mixed up formulations there, I mean: Otherwise, other than Gwenview (which is in kdegraphics itself, so it doesn't need a kdegraphics-devel), I don't think anything can use them yet. Cool, looks like omitting the kde4-devel bits for F-9 is doable. Moving forward with F-10+, I'm pretty sure we can drop the kde3-devel bits, and other related apps needing kde4 upgrades will include kipi-plugins, kphotoalbum, showimg. If the libs are very incompatible, shouldn't the .pc file get a rename to include a version number? In a perfect world, yes, but that's only if upstream has the means and intention to support parallel-install of said versions. alright, implemented ideas from comment #9 into kdegraphics-4.0.99-2 |