Bug 458773

Summary: Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rajesh Krishnan <raj.dev.redhat>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, pahan, panemade, paul, pingou
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://geany-plugins.sourceforge.net/geanyvc/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-01 09:54:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
geany-vc-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm
none
geany-vc.spec none

Description Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 07:52:55 UTC
Created attachment 314063 [details]
geany-vc-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description of problem:
New plugin for geany: geany-vc

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.3

Actual results:
1. Builds fine on Fedora Rawhide (10).


Additional info:

1.  Currently I have repackaged the source with renamed base directory for the package.  The URL to the source package is shared off my local server.  Maybe in the next iteration we could perhaps retain the original name of the source package while keeping the visible name of the package as geany-vc (or geany-geanyvc if we prefer to be too strict).

2.  SRPM and SPEC are attached.

3.  Once the package is installed, the user can see the new plugin becomes available in Geany (see manage plugins dialog).

4.  Built on Fedora 9 + rawhide repositories enabled; on X86_64.

Comment 1 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 07:54:29 UTC
Created attachment 314064 [details]
geany-vc.spec

Comment 2 Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 08:52:02 UTC
PLEASE use the template below (as described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join)for your package review submissions:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review

It saves other people having to edit your submissions - the formatting is important because the review tickets are processed by scripts.

Comment 3 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 19:17:54 UTC
OK I will look for the new package submission template.

The question is, why doesn't the the Fedora bugzilla automatically display the template when I choose the "Package Review" option at the time of submission?  Something like that would be quite useful and much better than the static bug-submission template that gets shown.

-Rajesh Krishnan

Comment 4 Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 22:21:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> OK I will look for the new package submission template.
> 
> The question is, why doesn't the the Fedora bugzilla automatically display the
> template when I choose the "Package Review" option at the time of submission? 
> Something like that would be quite useful and much better than the static
> bug-submission template that gets shown.

Good point; how about raising that on fedora-infrastructure-list?

Comment 5 Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 20:18:39 UTC
It has been two months since the review was submitted, but no Spec or SRPM has been provided. Please provide URLs to a Spec/SRPM pair as soon as possible.

Comment 6 Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 20:32:33 UTC
Sorry, I missed those attachments. Please consider following the template (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review) as mentioned by Paul in future.

Are you sponsored? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager does not mention a sponsor against your name. If you are not sponsored then please follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request

Comment 7 Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-03-20 07:56:59 UTC
Are you still interested to get geanyvc in the repo ?

Comment 8 Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-04-01 09:22:52 UTC
I am willing to port geanyvc into Fedora, please step up if you still want (you were there the first ;-) )
We could also co-maintain it if you like

Comment 9 Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-01 09:54:49 UTC
Ok. I see Pierre is interested to package this and no progress made here since months.
Therefore closing this and continuing review bug 490725

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 490725 ***