Bug 460598

Summary: Services unknown traceback during startup
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Component: system-config-servicesAssignee: Nils Philippsen <nphilipp>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: dakingun, davidz, flokip
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.99.23 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-12 15:41:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot none

Description Matthias Clasen 2008-08-28 22:06:33 UTC
With s-c-s 0.99.22, I see lots of errors like:

ERROR:dbus.connection:Exception in handler for D-Bus signal:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 214, in maybe_handle_message
    self._handler(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scservices/dbus/proxy/serviceherders.py", line 126, in notify
    self.dbus_notify (subscriber, service_name, change)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scservices/dbus/proxy/serviceherders.py", line 93, in dbus_notify
    service = self.services[service_name]
KeyError: dbus.String(u'restorecond')


The ui comes up, but the list of services remains insensitive, so it is pretty useless.

Comment 1 Nils Philippsen 2008-08-29 12:02:21 UTC
Not really a dbus communication problem, rather a "message about service status change arriving before message about service being added" one. Can I expect DBus signals to be received in the order they were sent?

Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-07 08:15:31 UTC
*** Bug 461210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Andreas Tunek 2008-09-09 18:15:52 UTC
Created attachment 316225 [details]
Screenshot

Here is a (possibly useless) screenshot of the non-active list in the program.

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-12 12:09:29 UTC
It turned out to be a different problem. I've just implemented a fix upstream, so the next version available shouldn't show this problem anymore.

Comment 5 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-12 15:41:49 UTC
Fixed in version 0.99.23 which should hit Rawhide shortly.