Bug 460598 - Services unknown traceback during startup
Summary: Services unknown traceback during startup
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-services
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nils Philippsen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 461210 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-08-28 22:06 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2008-09-12 15:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 0.99.23
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-12 15:41:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot (99.83 KB, image/png)
2008-09-09 18:15 UTC, Andreas Tunek
no flags Details

Description Matthias Clasen 2008-08-28 22:06:33 UTC
With s-c-s 0.99.22, I see lots of errors like:

ERROR:dbus.connection:Exception in handler for D-Bus signal:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 214, in maybe_handle_message
    self._handler(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scservices/dbus/proxy/serviceherders.py", line 126, in notify
    self.dbus_notify (subscriber, service_name, change)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scservices/dbus/proxy/serviceherders.py", line 93, in dbus_notify
    service = self.services[service_name]
KeyError: dbus.String(u'restorecond')


The ui comes up, but the list of services remains insensitive, so it is pretty useless.

Comment 1 Nils Philippsen 2008-08-29 12:02:21 UTC
Not really a dbus communication problem, rather a "message about service status change arriving before message about service being added" one. Can I expect DBus signals to be received in the order they were sent?

Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-07 08:15:31 UTC
*** Bug 461210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Andreas Tunek 2008-09-09 18:15:52 UTC
Created attachment 316225 [details]
Screenshot

Here is a (possibly useless) screenshot of the non-active list in the program.

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-12 12:09:29 UTC
It turned out to be a different problem. I've just implemented a fix upstream, so the next version available shouldn't show this problem anymore.

Comment 5 Nils Philippsen 2008-09-12 15:41:49 UTC
Fixed in version 0.99.23 which should hit Rawhide shortly.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.