Bug 462631

Summary:	Missing error in "rpm -e foo.i386" when only foo.x86_64 is installed
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component:	rpm	Assignee:	Panu Matilainen <pmatilai>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9	CC:	ffesti, jnovy, pnasrat
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-04-07 05:19:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ville Skyttä 2008-09-17 17:18:14 UTC

rpm-4.4.2.3-2.fc9.x86_64:

    # rpm -q foo
    package foo is not installed
    # rpm -e foo.i386
    error: package foo.i386 is not installed
    # echo $?
    1

The above is fine, but:

    # rpm -q firefox
    firefox-3.0.1-1.fc9.x86_64
    # rpm -e firefox.i386
    # echo $?
    0

I would have expected a "error: package firefox.i386 is not installed" error message and exit status 1.  rpm -q works as expected though:

    # rpm -q firefox.i386
    package firefox.i386 is not installed

Comment 1 Panu Matilainen 2008-09-18 07:31:37 UTC

This is essentially the same issue as bug 124016 but different place, fixed upstream now.

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2009-04-06 19:50:14 UTC

Works for me in F-10's rpm-4.6.0-1.fc10.x86_64, can be closed as far as I'm concerned.