Bug 46627

Summary:	wu-ftpd-2.6.1-16.src.rpm builds using wu-ftpd-2.7.0 (alpha?) source code
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Gilbert E. Detillieux <gedetil>
Component:	wu-ftpd	Assignee:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.1
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2001-06-29 17:01:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gilbert E. Detillieux 2001-06-29 17:01:21 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.7 i686)

Description of problem:
There appears to be at the very least a version mismatch in the
wu-ftpd-2.6.1-16 packages, included in Red Hat 7.1.  The source tarball is
wu-ftpd-2.7.0-20010328.tar.bz2, which is not even available at the wu-ftpd
public FTP sites, suggesting this is still an early alpha release.
Probably not a good idea to include that in a production release (although
fine for rawhide and beta releases), but in any case, shouldn't the package
version number reflect that of the source code it uses?

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qilvp
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.1/en/os/i386/SRPMS/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-16.src.rpm
2. Examine output, looking for version number on tarball.
3.
	

Actual Results:  Source tarball is wu-ftpd-2.7.0-20010328.tar.bz2.

Expected Results:  Source should be 2.6.1, as package version suggests. 
This is the current official version.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2001-07-03 16:38:56 UTC

Yes, the tarball is taken from the CVS stable branch. It has quite a number of 
bugfixes and unstable new features don't go to the stable branch.