From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.7 i686) Description of problem: There appears to be at the very least a version mismatch in the wu-ftpd-2.6.1-16 packages, included in Red Hat 7.1. The source tarball is wu-ftpd-2.7.0-20010328.tar.bz2, which is not even available at the wu-ftpd public FTP sites, suggesting this is still an early alpha release. Probably not a good idea to include that in a production release (although fine for rawhide and beta releases), but in any case, shouldn't the package version number reflect that of the source code it uses? How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -qilvp ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.1/en/os/i386/SRPMS/wu-ftpd-2.6.1-16.src.rpm 2. Examine output, looking for version number on tarball. 3. Actual Results: Source tarball is wu-ftpd-2.7.0-20010328.tar.bz2. Expected Results: Source should be 2.6.1, as package version suggests. This is the current official version. Additional info:
Yes, the tarball is taken from the CVS stable branch. It has quite a number of bugfixes and unstable new features don't go to the stable branch.