Bug 466512
Summary: | can we share cmaps with ghostscript ? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
Component: | poppler | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ddumas, rdieter, rvokal, twaugh |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-07-10 10:17:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthias Clasen
2008-10-10 17:09:01 UTC
*** Bug 466513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Tim, have you got any notions or ideas on how best to share poppler-data (see bug #507675 ) with ghostscript? 2 quick ideas come to mind: 1. patch ghostscript to use poppler-data directly, including location and layout 2. use symlinks to make poppler-data layout the data on-disk as ghostscript uses it now. 3. use some hybrid of 1 and 2 Personally, I'd prefer 1, which would likely be the most upstreamable approach (to me). What say you? Tim, ping ? I still haven't had the time to look at this, and don't really know how the internals of the CMap code work in ghostscript. :-( Please take a look at ghostscript in current rawhide... FYI: TeX Live now prefers /usr/share/poppler/cMap over the ghostscript directory. In any case it would be nice to see it unified. Please see comment #7, which refers to ghostscript-9.00-12. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Turns out that comment #9 is tersely suggesting that this is fixed in ghostscript with bug#630632 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 630632 *** |