Bug 470642

Summary: Request to return awesfx to repository
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: The Source <thesource>
Component: awesfxAssignee: Jaroslav Kysela <jkysela>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: draeath, jkysela, stransky
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-25 19:26:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Source RPM that works none

Description The Source 2008-11-08 08:06:34 UTC 
Description of problem:
new version (0.5.1c) is compatible with latest software and compiles fine. Please add a package to repository.
Here's the link to source codes:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/tiwai/awesfx/awesfx-0.5.1c.tar.bz2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.5.1c

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2008-12-22 18:08:46 UTC 
Any news here?

There's a thread on fedora-list where it is pointed out that awesfx is missing and needed.
Comment 2 Paul Bransford 2008-12-22 22:00:26 UTC 
Please see: https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=65787&forum=10

As well, please see bug 405131

For what it's worth, I'm tossing in my $0.02 and saying awesfx is still needed.
Comment 3 Tim Nelson 2009-01-20 04:25:36 UTC 
Created attachment 329420 [details]
Source RPM that works

My basic method (IIRC) for creating this was:
1. Install the SUSE SRPM (linked above) on my computer
2. Install the Fedora 8 SRPM (found this somewhere; sunet.se???)
3. Change the Fedora 8 spec file in various ways including:
- Refer to the source from the SUSE SRPM
- Don't use the patch that was previously used
- There's no INSTALL file, so remove that from the list of files
- Add a bunch of additional files that built
Comment 4 Martin Stransky 2009-01-20 08:38:32 UTC 
You can route this request through standard was for new packages. Create the sample rpm and ask for review... see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-25 19:26:53 UTC 
If someone wants to get awesfx introduced into Fedora again,
please submit a new review request, thank you!

This package is blocked in Apr 2008, so re-introducing this package
needs new review request.
Comment 6 Guido Grazioli 2009-03-13 14:49:27 UTC 
Submitted new review request for reintroduction of awesfx package in Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061