Bug 483466

Summary: hdf5 : Unowned directories
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: hdf5Assignee: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 11CC: orion, pertusus
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-20 21:45:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 483469    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Michael Schwendt 2009-02-01 15:54:23 UTC
One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> hdf5-1.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm
=> hdf5-devel-1.8.1-2.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/lib/gfortran
/usr/lib/gfortran/modules

No other packages provides these either!

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but
still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py
$ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^hdf5

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2009-02-02 11:38:12 UTC
hdf5-devel depends on libgfortran.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 11:01:06 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Orion Poplawski 2009-11-20 21:45:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 513985 ***