Bug 486937 (rhnlib)

Summary: Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: atodorov, dgilmore, fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: dgilmore: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-16 09:20:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 452450    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2009-02-23 11:06:54 UTC
SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib.spec
SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib-2.5.10-1.src.rpm

Description:
rhnlib is a collection of python modules used by the 
Red Hat Network (http://rhn.redhat.com) software.

Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1145761

Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2009-03-13 03:29:40 UTC
builds fine in mock on F-11. 

rpmlint is quiet.

source matches upstream.
sha256sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz 
92539024bc5e6cbb8f225333be402bef494a5d2d212c66b813897699c79a3bd7  rpmbuild/SOURCES/rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz
92539024bc5e6cbb8f225333be402bef494a5d2d212c66b813897699c79a3bd7  rhnlib-2.5.10.tar.gz

looks good to me

Approved

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2009-03-13 08:32:59 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rhnlib
Short Description: Python libraries for the RHN project
Owners: msuchy
Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-16 02:17:48 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 4 Alexander Todorov 2009-10-29 16:59:50 UTC
I'm seeing this package in EPEL which is newer than what I have from rhn.redhat.com. Can the two packages conflict or the newer package break things on a RHEL5 system ?