Bug 492629
| Summary: | Explicit package conflicts on split media installs not found until specific transaction containing them | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jesse Keating <jkeating> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, dcantrell, jonathan.cervidae, pjones, rmaximo, stickster, tcallawa, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-06-08 19:32:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jesse Keating
2009-03-27 18:58:42 UTC
This isn't anything new. The problem we're going to end up having is that when we build the transaction the only thing we get back is whether or not there's an error plus a list of messages. That will include both dep problems (which are "okay") and conflicts. And the only way to tell which we've got would be to parse strings of error messages :/ Alternatively, change the rpm bindings so that instead of error strings we get error objects back and can check the object type. I don't see how we can possibly get to this in time for F11, given all the storage stuff yet to fix. *** Bug 504308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Noted on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading#Tips Review and correction of the wiki page is appreciated. :-) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 472958 *** |