Bug 495615
Summary: | Update rhn_register to properly parse the dmi information on for registration on a kvm host | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Daniel Riek <riek> |
Component: | rhn-client-tools | Assignee: | Pradeep Kilambi <pkilambi> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | bburns, bperkins, jhutar, morazi, psklenar, tsanders |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-02 11:20:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 495612, 501787 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Daniel Riek
2009-04-14 03:25:44 UTC
Daniel - Can you explain this further? What doe you mean by identify the KVM Host? Did you mean KVM "guest"? -Todd hello, my tests environment: 1. Serve, Domain-0 dhcp-lab-159.englab.brq.redhat.com - rhn_register to rhn.webqa - XEN hypervizor - it's Domain-0 2. xen20.englab.brq.redhat.com, Domain-U - xen20 is created on dhcp-lab-159.englab.brq.redhat.com - rhn_register to rhn_webqa - it's Domain-U 3. Details for dhcp-lab-159.englab.brq.redhat.com on rhn.webqa.r.c but there isn't info about its domain-1 xen20 --- should I use only KVM virtualization or XEN hypervizor? Is rhn.webqa.r.c supported for it? An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1354.html |