Bug 501559
| Summary: | Querying by partner a bit quirky | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Andrius Benokraitis <andriusb> |
| Component: | Query/Bug List | Assignee: | Noura El hawary <nelhawar> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.2 | CC: | cward, eriley |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-07-06 20:14:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andrius Benokraitis
2009-05-19 18:19:24 UTC
Not sure of the example you're trying to squeeze out here, but if you do Partner::greatherthan::0 in the boolean query search, you will get a list of all bugs which have at leave one partnerID selected in the Partner field. That's sorta like a * search. ... to bad though Partner::greatherthan::1 doesn't actually find bugs which contain more than 1 id selected... :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500964 Noura, can you please comment on this issue? Thanks Dave This bug is similar to bug #500964 and i have made a comment there that would have similar answer to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500964#c1 basically there is no current way at the moment to search by the number of or the count of partners, verified, issue trackers etc in a bug report, the way the current search works is by searching using the actual values of the fields instead of the number of its items/values. having a search that will look for the number of the values will be a new feature request in bugzilla, that we might be able to work on in the future. Cheers, Noura I think comment #1 might answer the original post, Andrius? Otherwise, yea, bug #500964 is the RFE for the mentioned feature so we could search based on the number of items selected. It would be nice... :) Yup, I think you are right - it would be an RFE then. In the meantime I'll need to be explicit with searching in the meantime. Andrius, do you agree then to CLOSE->NOTABUG this and add your votes to the RFE noted above? sounds good to me! See bug #500964 for RFE *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 500964 *** |