Bug 502759
Summary: | switch to using PolicyKit | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rahul Sundaram <sundaram> |
Component: | system-config-bind | Assignee: | Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jreznik, rvokal, smohan |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-05-27 08:02:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 502765 |
Description
Rahul Sundaram
2009-05-27 04:57:25 UTC
Hi, I'm not sure how to deal with this report - it's duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493903 and PolicyKit ports (of all s-c-* tools that need to be ported) are part of System Configuration Cleanup Project. So it blocks two trackers, two projects - which one is more appropriate? I didn't realize that the cleanup project including this port until after I had filed it. Since the original one includes a broader scope, you can close and marking mine as a duplicate. Ok, thanks! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 493903 *** |