Bug 506450
Summary: | Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Yanko Kaneti <yaneti> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bnocera, fedora-package-review, notting, yaneti |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | yaneti:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-24 20:34:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 506446, 506476 |
Description
Peter Robinson
2009-06-17 11:59:58 UTC
MUST: twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ Should be License: LGPLv2 Cosmetic: URL: http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib makes more sense I think. BuildRequires: gtk-doc is not really necessary , the tarball has that already built. The package has a testsuite that doesn't seem to do anything network related. You could add %check make check With the license change this package is APPROVED. I am not sure why this is a blocker for the rest review... (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: > twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > Should be License: LGPLv2 I put that because from the README file: Twitter-GLib is released under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 or, at your option, any later version. > Cosmetic: > > URL: http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib > makes more sense I think. Will do, I never found that one previously :) > BuildRequires: gtk-doc > is not really necessary , the tarball has that already built. > > The package has a testsuite that doesn't seem to do anything network related. > You could add > %check > make check > > With the license change this package is APPROVED. > > I am not sure why this is a blocker for the rest review... It shouldn't have been, but I was looking at hundreds of deps/bz bugs etc yesterday so it was probably a brain fart. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > MUST: > > twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > > Should be License: LGPLv2 > > I put that because from the README file: > Twitter-GLib is released under the terms of the GNU Lesser General > Public License version 2.1 or, at your option, any later version. Oh, very sorry, I've missed the any later part. :/ According to the guidelines the short form of this to be used in spec files is: LGPLv2+ Thanks for the update. I've fixed it on my local copy ready for commit. Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: twitter-glib Short Description: A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: CVS done. Build in rawhide Done. Thanks for the review! |