Bug 508416
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting, ulrich.schwickerath |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | lkundrak:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-01-02 15:13:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 508417 |
Description
Mamoru TASAKA
2009-06-26 22:46:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > There are many rpmlint warining/errors on -doc subpackage, however > these are on examples and I think they are safe to ignore. Agreed. * Package named correctly * Macros used consistently * Builds fine in mock * Requires/provides sane * filelist mostly sane (see below) * rpmlint mostly ok (see below) * spec file clean and legible (well, you could improve indentation in %globals paragraph :) Needs work: 1.) Tests failing. According to the comments you seem to be aware of that. Not blocking a review. 2.) Rpmlint rubygem-mkrf.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/cache/mkrf-0.2.3.gem 0600 You probably want to change this via %attr in %files or change the mode in %install or something. Thank you for review. (In reply to comment #1) > * spec file clean and legible > (well, you could improve indentation in %globals paragraph :) - Perhaps now it should look better. > 2.) Rpmlint > > rubygem-mkrf.noarch: E: non-readable > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/cache/mkrf-0.2.3.gem 0600 > > You probably want to change this via %attr in %files or change the mode in > %install or something. - Fixed. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf-0.2.3-2.fc.src.rpm * Thu Jul 9 2009 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 0.2.3-2 - Improve indentation - Make sure gem is installed with proper permission Looks fine now, thanks. APPROVED Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mkrf Short Description: Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) CVS done. Now closing. Thank you for reviewing and CVS procedure. Hi, would it be possible to have this package for el6 as well ? It is required by rubygem-xmlparser Thanks a lot! Ulrich (In reply to comment #7) > would it be possible to have this package for el6 as well ? I Currently I don't have any intention of maintaining packages on EPEL. If you want this package on EPEL, please feel free to become the maintainer on EPEL. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-mkrf New Branches: el6 Owners: schwicke Git done (by process-git-requests). Closing this as this need not being open. |