Bug 520500
Summary: | Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting, overholt |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | overholt:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-01 08:07:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 429551 |
Description
Alexander Kurtakov
2009-08-31 19:31:06 UTC
This is a full review request. Pre review was #500270 . - no differences in source I get vs. what's in the SRPM X please make lines 19, 20, 90, and 95 < 80 characters ? should we make the versioned BRs and Rs on maven2 be >= 2.0.8? X let's drop the with_maven/without_maven junk at the top - macros sane - clean used appropriately - licensing fine - description and summary fine X please add a changelog entry - builds fine - rpmlint output is fine (doesn't like maven fragment in /etc and no files to mark as documentation) I forgot one thing: X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom (JPP-maven-enforcer-rule-api.pom) (In reply to comment #2) > - no differences in source I get vs. what's in the SRPM > X please make lines 19, 20, 90, and 95 < 80 characters Fixed. %add_to_maven_depmap line can't be fixed because this breaks the macro. > ? should we make the versioned BRs and Rs on maven2 be >= 2.0.8? Done. > X let's drop the with_maven/without_maven junk at the top Fixed. > - macros sane > - clean used appropriately > - licensing fine > - description and summary fine > X please add a changelog entry Done. > - builds fine > - rpmlint output is fine (doesn't like maven fragment in /etc and no files to > mark as documentation) > X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom > (JPP-maven-enforcer-rule-api.pom) Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-enforcer-rule-api.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-enforcer-rule-api-1.0-0.1.a2.1.5.fc11.src.rpm Approved. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-enforcer-rule-api Short Description: This component provides the generic interfaces needed to implement custom rules for the maven-enforcer-plugin. Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: I shortened the Short Description to actually be short. CVS done. Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130084 Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: maven-enforcer-rule-api New Branches: EL-6 Owners: bar lkundrak Unfortunately, overholt, who owns this in Fedora stated (by mail) that he can't maintain this in EPEL. CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). User 'bar' doesn't seem to exist. Otherwise done. |