Bug 536314 (RHQ-678)

Summary: HA adminstrative dashboard
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Joseph Marques <jmarques>
Component: PluginsAssignee: Joseph Marques <jmarques>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-678
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.1 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 536419, 536420, 536421, 536422, 536423, 536424, 536425, 536426, 536442, 536443, 536469, 536510    
Bug Blocks: 536277    

Description Joseph Marques 2008-07-15 21:44:00 UTC
current topology view
* how many servers
* which agents are connected to which servers
* the server-list that each agent has

group membership event tracking
* when rhq server instance was added to cluster
* when rhq server instance was removed from cluster

balancing heuristics tracking
* repartition tracking
** when and which agents fell over to some backup
** record of actual fallover (from and to server identities) 
** why - server membership change, or balancing repartition?
* metric load/throughput on each server in the rhq cluster

control / operations
* remotely shutdown over server instances in the rhq cluster (will only work if not using the embedded agent?)
* put all agents [ for some server instance] into maintenance mode

TEST control / operations
* suspend some server - takes it out of the rhq server cluster, which should initiate an agent repartition
* un-suspend some server - puts some rhq server instance back into the cluster, which should initiate an agent repartition

Comment 1 Joseph Marques 2008-10-02 15:42:16 UTC
all features targeted for 1.1 are complete.  remaining sub-issue will be pushed.

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2009-11-10 21:14:34 UTC
This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-678