Bug 537268
| Summary: | RFC: python3-jinja2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> | ||||
| Component: | python-jinja2 | Assignee: | Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | thomas.moschny | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-08-19 00:53:05 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 537266 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 530636 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Dave Malcolm
2009-11-13 00:04:28 UTC
Created attachment 369357 [details]
Separate specfile that builds (adapted from python-jinja2.spec; no changelog). Barely tested.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle. Changing version to '12'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping (In reply to comment #0) > I experimented and was able to use python-jinja2.spec to create a > python3-jinja2.spec that builds, using 2to3 at the end of the %prep phase, with > some other fixups; it should be parallel-installable with the python 2 > python-jinja2. > > I haven't properly tested it yet, though. > > Do you know what upstream's plans are for python 3 support? > > I saw this: > http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs/browse_thread/thread/efda29f8bddba84f/56aae1cd46bdadba?lnk=gst&q=python+3#56aae1cd46bdadba > "Jinja2 for Python 3" > > I'm happy to accept a Jinja2 python3 port assuming it works in a way > > that I just have to run it through 2to3 to get an updated version (or > > the other way round). > > Maintaining two completely independent versions at the same time is > > tedious and I don't have the time for it :( " > > If I sent a patch that added a python3-jinja2 subpackage to the python-jinja2 > build, would that be acceptable by you? Yes. Reading http://groups.google.com/group/pocoo-libs/browse_thread/thread/468e2869a79a0737/1ec201d986cd843d, I think running 2to3 might not be enough. Will have a look though. Just to let you know that I'm working on a specfile that will produce a python3-jinja2 subpackage. Just talked to upstream, and they will be releasing a new version which should have the 2to3 call in the setup.py within the next few days. Ok, so here's what it currently looks like: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-jinja2/python-jinja2.spec Comments welcome. Guess it doesn't make sense to commit that to rawhide yet, as long as bug 537266 blocks us? This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle. Changing version to '13'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Finally built python-jinja2-2.5-1 for rawhide, including a python3 subpackage. Please test. If it works well, we might consider issuing an F13 update as well. Therefore, not yet closing this bug. Ok, seems there's not much interest in an F13 package. |