Bug 554791

Summary: The Sudoers description is not correct - looks like its was copied from Hosts File?
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: ConfigurationAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.4CC: cwelton, jshaughn
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: SubBug
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-23 20:56:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 545537, 565628    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Sudoers Description is wrong. none

Description John Sefler 2010-01-12 17:05:31 UTC
Created attachment 383285 [details]
Sudoers Description is wrong.

Description of problem:
In the UI for a Sudoers resource, the default General Property Description states "The static table lookup for host names".  This is not accurate.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Builds of master dated in early Jan 2010.


How reproducible:
Open a Sudoers resource and look at the Summary of General Properties on its Inventory tab.
See the attached screenhot
  
Actual results:
Description: The static table lookup for host names

Expected result:
Description: List of which users may execute what  < This is just a better suggestion


Additional info:

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:51:30 UTC
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:57:47 UTC
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 3 Corey Welton 2010-09-30 14:13:39 UTC
lowering priority - not an enterprise plugin

Comment 4 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-05-23 20:56:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 545544 ***