Bug 554791 - The Sudoers description is not correct - looks like its was copied from Hosts File?
Summary: The Sudoers description is not correct - looks like its was copied from Hosts...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 545544
Alias: None
Product: RHQ Project
Classification: Other
Component: Configuration
Version: 1.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHQ Project Maintainer
QA Contact: John Sefler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHQ_Config rhq_triage
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-12 17:05 UTC by John Sefler
Modified: 2014-05-23 20:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-23 20:56:53 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Sudoers Description is wrong. (123.86 KB, image/png)
2010-01-12 17:05 UTC, John Sefler
no flags Details

Description John Sefler 2010-01-12 17:05:31 UTC
Created attachment 383285 [details]
Sudoers Description is wrong.

Description of problem:
In the UI for a Sudoers resource, the default General Property Description states "The static table lookup for host names".  This is not accurate.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Builds of master dated in early Jan 2010.


How reproducible:
Open a Sudoers resource and look at the Summary of General Properties on its Inventory tab.
See the attached screenhot
  
Actual results:
Description: The static table lookup for host names

Expected result:
Description: List of which users may execute what  < This is just a better suggestion


Additional info:

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:51:30 UTC
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:57:47 UTC
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 3 Corey Welton 2010-09-30 14:13:39 UTC
lowering priority - not an enterprise plugin

Comment 4 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-05-23 20:56:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 545544 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.