Bug 563481
Summary: | Review Request: aduna-commons-i18n - Internationalization and localization utilities | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, oget.fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | oget.fedora:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-12-21 23:42:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 561439 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Mary Ellen Foster
2010-02-10 11:42:01 UTC
Updated version with extra BuildRequirement: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm I reviewed this package. There are a few minor things but none of them are blockers. Please read through and modify the specfile if there is need before you commit ! rpmlint says: aduna-commons-i18n.src:123: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} This can be ignored. By the way you can get rid of the "%attr(-,root,root)" part aduna-commons-i18n.x86_64: W: no-documentation This can be ignored aduna-commons-i18n.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/aduna-commons-i18n This can be ignored ! %description for javadoc subpackage should not be the same description for the main package. ? This looks like a SUSE convention %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} %{_javadocdir}/%{name} Do we have this in Fedora? If not, please remove the symlink. ! It looks like the following BR's are not really needed: BuildRequires: maven2 BuildRequires: maven2-plugin-compiler BuildRequires: maven2-plugin-javadoc BuildRequires: maven-plugin-bundle These will be pulled in by other dependencies so it won't do harm to leave them but the following , I think, is absolutely not needed. BuildRequires: maven-surefire-provider-junit ----------------------------------------------------- This package (aduna-commons-i18n) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- New version: - Remove BuildRequirements that are pulled in by aduna-commons POM - Require the main package in the javadoc http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n.spec http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n-1.3.0-3.fc12.src.rpm Mary Ellen, in case you didn't notice, I already approved the package in comment #2. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aduna-commons-i18n Short Description: Internationalization and localization utilities Owners: mef Branches: F-12 InitialCC: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aduna-commons-i18n Short Description: Internationalization and localization utilities Owners: mef Branches: F-12 InitialCC: (Sorry for the duplicate -- I got a bugzilla server error the first time ...) CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). (added a F-13 branch as well) The package doesn't seem to be imported to cvs yet. Is there a problem? Mary, is there something wrong? I retired and blocked the package. |