Bug 563481

Summary: Review Request: aduna-commons-i18n - Internationalization and localization utilities
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, oget.fedora
Target Milestone: ---Flags: oget.fedora: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-21 23:42:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 561439    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Mary Ellen Foster 2010-02-10 11:42:01 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n-1.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: Internationalization and localization utilities

Comment 2 Orcan Ogetbil 2010-02-21 06:46:37 UTC
I reviewed this package. There are a few minor things but none of them are blockers. Please read through and modify the specfile if there is need before you commit


! rpmlint says:
   aduna-commons-i18n.src:123: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
       This can be ignored. By the way you can get rid of the "%attr(-,root,root)" part

   aduna-commons-i18n.x86_64: W: no-documentation
       This can be ignored

   aduna-commons-i18n.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/aduna-commons-i18n
       This can be ignored


! %description for javadoc subpackage should not be the same description for the main package.


? This looks like a SUSE convention
   %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
   %{_javadocdir}/%{name}
Do we have this in Fedora? If not, please remove the symlink.


! It looks like the following BR's are not really needed:
   BuildRequires: maven2
   BuildRequires: maven2-plugin-compiler
   BuildRequires: maven2-plugin-javadoc
   BuildRequires: maven-plugin-bundle
These will be pulled in by other dependencies so it won't do harm to leave them but the following , I think, is absolutely not needed.
   BuildRequires: maven-surefire-provider-junit




-----------------------------------------------------
This package (aduna-commons-i18n) is APPROVED by oget
-----------------------------------------------------

Comment 3 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-02-23 14:08:01 UTC
New version:
- Remove BuildRequirements that are pulled in by aduna-commons POM
- Require the main package in the javadoc

http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n.spec
http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/aduna-commons-i18n-1.3.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

Comment 4 Orcan Ogetbil 2010-03-06 09:02:40 UTC
Mary Ellen, in case you didn't notice, I already approved the package in comment #2.

Comment 5 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-03-23 10:37:16 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: aduna-commons-i18n
Short Description: Internationalization and localization utilities
Owners: mef
Branches: F-12
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-03-23 10:41:32 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: aduna-commons-i18n
Short Description: Internationalization and localization utilities
Owners: mef
Branches: F-12
InitialCC:

Comment 7 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-03-23 10:41:57 UTC
(Sorry for the duplicate -- I got a bugzilla server error the first time ...)

Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2010-03-24 03:24:24 UTC
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

(added a F-13 branch as well)

Comment 9 Orcan Ogetbil 2010-06-21 02:33:16 UTC
The package doesn't seem to be imported to cvs yet. Is there a problem?

Comment 10 Orcan Ogetbil 2010-11-06 06:28:00 UTC
Mary, is there something wrong?

Comment 11 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-21 23:42:30 UTC
I retired and blocked the package.