Bug 577898
| Summary: | Missing Device ID for HP Officejet 7300 series | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jiri Popelka <jpopelka> |
| Component: | hplip | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | jpopelka, twaugh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-05-07 04:01:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 219467 | ||
|
Description
Jiri Popelka
2010-03-29 16:10:57 UTC
Tim:
There's already this change in hplip-device-ids.patch
@@ -3414,7 +3414,7 @@ Manufacturer "HP"
ModelName "HP Officejet 7300 Series"
Attribute "NickName" "" "HP Officejet 7300 Series, $Version"
Attribute "ShortNickName" "" "HP Officejet 7300 Series"
- Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:HP;MDL:officejet 7300 series;DES:officejet 7300 series;"
+ Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:Hewlett-Packard;MDL:officejet 7300 series;DES:officejet 7300 series;"
PCFileName "hp-officejet_7300_series.ppd"
Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Officejet 7310 All-in-one Printer)"
Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Officejet 7310xi All-in-one Printer)"
So, which ID is correct ?
I think the one from *this* bug report is the correct one. The hplip-device-ids.patch change was just copying the Device IDs from foomatic-db, which is slightly more reliable (but not foolproof). In this case, we can see the evidence backing up the Device ID in bug #198999. The foomatic-db change was made automatically, but my script was confused by there being two entries: <autodetect> <general> <commandset>MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,BIDI-ECP</commandset> <manufacturer>Hewlett-Packard</manufacturer> <model>officejet 7300 series</model> </general> <usb> <commandset>MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,DESKJET,DYN</commandset> <description>6543</description> <manufacturer>HP</manufacturer> <model>Officejet 7300 series</model> </usb> </autodetect> The second entry there agrees with ours -- as you might expect, as I put that there in 2006 from bug #198999. :-) Hmm, looks like I actually broke a correct Device ID then in hplip-device-ids.patch. :-( I guess the simplest thing to do is just remove that part of the patch. hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |