Description of problem: Using the lpinfo -l -v output from bug #198999, I get this: $ python check-device-ids.py "HP Officejet 7300 series" "MFG:HP;MDL:Officejet 7300 series;CMD:MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,DESKJET,DYN;1284.4DL:4d,4e,1;CLS:PRINTER;DES:6543;SN:MY64PQ853B04HR;" Installing relevant drivers using session service Fetching driver list └── HP Officejet 7300 series: MFG:HP;MDL:Officejet 7300 series;CMD:MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,DESKJET,DYN; (No drivers) MISSING drv:///hp/hpcups.drv/hp-officejet_7300_series.ppd [/usr/share/cups/drv/hp/hpcups.drv] MISSING foomatic:HP-OfficeJet_7300-hpijs.ppd [/usr/lib/cups/driver/foomatic] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): hplip-3.10.2-5.fc13
Tim: There's already this change in hplip-device-ids.patch @@ -3414,7 +3414,7 @@ Manufacturer "HP" ModelName "HP Officejet 7300 Series" Attribute "NickName" "" "HP Officejet 7300 Series, $Version" Attribute "ShortNickName" "" "HP Officejet 7300 Series" - Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:HP;MDL:officejet 7300 series;DES:officejet 7300 series;" + Attribute "1284DeviceID" "" "MFG:Hewlett-Packard;MDL:officejet 7300 series;DES:officejet 7300 series;" PCFileName "hp-officejet_7300_series.ppd" Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Officejet 7310 All-in-one Printer)" Attribute "Product" "" "(HP Officejet 7310xi All-in-one Printer)" So, which ID is correct ?
I think the one from *this* bug report is the correct one. The hplip-device-ids.patch change was just copying the Device IDs from foomatic-db, which is slightly more reliable (but not foolproof). In this case, we can see the evidence backing up the Device ID in bug #198999. The foomatic-db change was made automatically, but my script was confused by there being two entries: <autodetect> <general> <commandset>MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,BIDI-ECP</commandset> <manufacturer>Hewlett-Packard</manufacturer> <model>officejet 7300 series</model> </general> <usb> <commandset>MLC,PCL,PML,DW-PCL,DESKJET,DYN</commandset> <description>6543</description> <manufacturer>HP</manufacturer> <model>Officejet 7300 series</model> </usb> </autodetect> The second entry there agrees with ours -- as you might expect, as I put that there in 2006 from bug #198999. :-) Hmm, looks like I actually broke a correct Device ID then in hplip-device-ids.patch. :-( I guess the simplest thing to do is just remove that part of the patch.
hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13
hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hplip'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13
hplip-3.10.2-11.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.