Bug 578701

Summary:	RFE - Include Pinta in Repos
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	David Le Sage <dlesage>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	13	CC:	fedora-package-review, notting, sebastian
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-04-01 14:19:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Le Sage 2010-04-01 05:16:42 UTC

Description of problem:
Pinta, a simple Mono-based GTK paint program, is being actively developed and has just released version 0.2.  It fills the niche for a simple painting and image editing program for GNOME/GTK that is not currently being fulfilled by any program.

See this site:
http://www.pinta-project.com/
for more information.  I think we should consider adding it to the repos to encourage development of it.

According to the website, "Pinta is licensed under the MIT X11 open source license." 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Pinta 0.2

How reproducible:
NA

Steps to Reproduce:
NA
  
Actual results:
NA

Expected results:
NA

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 14:19:42 UTC

Unfortunately this was opened as a package review ticket, and I see no package to review so I've no choice but to close this ticket.  The package review procedure should be used only if you are actually offering to maintain a package and are actually submitting a completed package for review.

If you wish to request that packages be added to the distribution, please edit the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList

Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2010-04-01 17:10:57 UTC

Even better, someone already submitted this for review.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 569038 ***

Comment 3 Sebastian Dziallas 2010-04-01 18:19:35 UTC

...and he'd appreciate a review over there. :)